Politicians in the United States have long framed policies around supporting families, but many current laws and regulations actively penalize married couples.

From higher tax burdens to reduced access to benefits, getting married can cost couples thousands of dollars per year.

These penalties disproportionately affect households where both spouses earn similar incomes and run contrary to the stated pro-family priorities of many lawmakers. This is highlighted today specifically in the Big Beautiful Bill student loan provisions, which actively penalize married couples in the new Repayment Assistance Plan.

Here are other examples of the marriage penalty that seeps throughout the tax code and other rules.

Common Marriage Penalties In The Tax Code

Here are some of the most common marriage penalties in the tax code:

Marriage Tax Bracket Penalties

While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 helped reduce marriage penalties for many by aligning most federal tax bracket thresholds for joint filers with twice the single filer amounts, the top bracket still starts at $751,601 for joint filers in 2025, compared to $662,351 for singles. 

This means high-income couples pay more in taxes than they would as unmarried individuals.

Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) 

Designed to support low-income families, the EITC begins to phase out at income levels that are not proportionally higher for married couples. For example, a single filer with one child may qualify with an income up to $49,084 in 2024, while the limit for a married couple with one child is only $56,004.

Mortgage Interest Deduction 

The cap on interest deductions is $750,000 of mortgage debt for both single and married filers. Two unmarried people co-owning a home can each deduct interest on $750,000 in mortgage debt, totaling $1.5 million. A married couple cannot. Even more so, married filing separately is uniquely capped at $375,000.

Social Security Taxation 

Benefits become taxable when combined income exceeds $32,000 for couples and $25,000 for individuals. Because the joint threshold isn’t double, many couples begin paying taxes on their benefits earlier than they would as two singles.

Medicare Surtax (Net Investment Income Tax)

The Medicare capital gains surtax kick in at $200,000 for singles and $250,000 for couples. Married filers can end up paying thousands more in taxes on wages and investment income.

Child and Dependent Care Credit

This credit starts to phase out at an AGI of $15,000. Since married couples must report joint income, they often lose access to the full credit sooner than two working single parents with similar earnings.

Other Marriage Penalties

These are semi-tied to the tax code, but impact other areas. They can still be costly for married couples.

HSA Contributions 

In 2025, the HSA contribution limit is $4,300 for individuals and $8,550 for families. A married couple each with self-only high-deductible health plans can contribute $8,600 total. But if one or both spouses are on a family plan, their joint cap is $8,550. 

Also, for the catch up contribution, two individuals could make $1,000 catch-up contributions. But if the married couples shares a family health plan, only one $1,000 catch up contribution is allowed.

But for the annual contribution, $50 less than two individuals can contribute separately. Why penalize a married couple $50? Is that really impactful to the federal budget?

Student Loan Repayment 

Income-driven repayment plans often use combined adjusted gross income (AGI) for married couples. For example, the old REPAYE plan calculates monthly payments using the household’s full income, even if the spouses file taxes separately. This can substantially raise monthly payments and slow repayment progress.

This potentially could be coming back with the new Repayment Assistance Plan, which proposes using joint AGI regardless of tax-filing status. 

Welfare Programs 

Medicaid, SNAP (food stamps), and preschool subsidies often have combined income limits for married couples that are less than double those for individuals.

For example, in New York, the maximum Medicaid income limit for singles is $1,800 per month, but married couples is only $2,433.  

This design punishes marriage among lower-income families, many who could lose access to benefits simply by tying the knot.

Contradictions From Politicians

These policies create economic disincentives to marriage, particularly for dual-income households and families with children. Despite political support for marriage and family values, little has been done to systematically remove these penalties.

Fixes are relatively straightforward. Adjusting tax and program thresholds to reflect true family sizes, rather than treating married couples as a single economic unit without proportionate increases in eligibility, would go a long way. In fact, recent studies show that 60% of married couples are dual full-time working income households. 

Many of these rules could be addressed through modest tax code revisions, better coordination between federal and state programs, and enhanced planning tools to help families assess trade-offs.

Until then, marriage remains an economic risk in many households. And for families already stretched thin, these penalties can undercut financial stability and long-term planning.

Don’t Miss These Other Stories: